The reference point solves the interference
For abnormal-course-condition relief in the general area, Rule 16 uses the nearest point of complete relief and a defined relief area. It does not promise a better angle, shorter grass or an unobstructed route to the hole.
Suppose a cart path interferes with a player’s stance. One side has rough close to the original position; the other has short grass farther away. Choosing the comfortable side just because it is more attractive would confuse relief from the path with relief from all difficulty.
Why the player tests a stance
An official may ask the player to recreate the intended stance and swing to locate where the interference ends. The point can therefore depend on how the shot would be played, not merely the ball’s distance from the edge of the path.
Watch the stance test before the club-length measurement. The first establishes the reference; the second maps the permitted area around it. If the broadcast shows only the final drop in rough, it can look like a bizarre voluntary choice. The earlier geometry explains it. This example assumes relief is actually available and does not cover unreasonable stroke choices, penalty-area exclusions or Local Rule variations. It shows why complete relief and a desirable lie are different ideas.
Questions answered
Does free relief guarantee short grass?
No. It removes the specified interference.
Why measure the intended stance first?
It helps locate the nearest point where the relevant interference is fully removed.
Sources & further reading
Official references for the subjects discussed. Service terms and device software can change.