Interception and prevention are different actions
Law 13 allows play to continue when a quick free kick is intercepted by an opponent who is still within the required distance. Deliberately preventing a quick restart is treated differently. Proximity alone does not describe which action occurred.
Suppose a midfielder takes a free kick immediately towards a teammate, while an opponent is still retreating through the passing lane. Contrast an opponent stepping in front of the stationary ball to stop the kick being taken. Both players may be equally close to the ball, but the sequence differs.
Begin before the kick
A replay beginning with the interception removes the evidence needed to distinguish the two situations. Rewind far enough to see whether the restart was available and how the opponent moved as the taker prepared to use it.
The quick decision carries a practical trade-off: the taker may exploit an unsettled defence, but the pass can also find a nearby opponent. That is an explanation of the tactical situation, not advice that guarantees an advantageous result. If the referee had already required a managed restart, other procedural considerations arise. For the simple quick-kick case, assess the opponent’s behaviour before reducing the decision to a distance argument.
Questions answered
Must every nearby interception cause a retake?
No. A quick kick can be intercepted while play continues.
What extra detail matters beyond distance?
Whether the opponent intercepted the played ball or deliberately prevented the restart.
Sources & further reading
Official references for the subjects discussed. Service terms and device software can change.